Information on Result #1066867
Linear OOA(3212, 66, F3, 4, 102) (dual of [(66, 4), 52, 103]-NRT-code), using OOA 2-folding based on linear OOA(3212, 132, F3, 2, 102) (dual of [(132, 2), 52, 103]-NRT-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(3212, 132, F3, 2, 104) (dual of [(132, 2), 52, 105]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8120, 33, F81, 20) (dual of [33, 13, 21]-code or 33-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8120, 81, F81, 20) (dual of [81, 61, 21]-code or 81-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(61,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8120, 81, F81, 20) (dual of [81, 61, 21]-code or 81-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- linear OOA(34, 4, F3, 2, 4) (dual of [(4, 2), 4, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;4,3) [i]
- linear OA(8120, 33, F81, 20) (dual of [33, 13, 21]-code or 33-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.