Information on Result #1134469
Linear OOA(288, 16, F2, 6, 56) (dual of [(16, 6), 8, 57]-NRT-code), using OOA 2-folding based on linear OOA(288, 32, F2, 3, 56) (dual of [(32, 3), 8, 57]-NRT-code), using
- 9 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(297, 35, F2, 3, 65) (dual of [(35, 3), 8, 66]-NRT-code), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
- linear OA(165, 7, F16, 5) (dual of [7, 2, 6]-code or 7-arc in PG(4,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(165, 16, F16, 5) (dual of [16, 11, 6]-code or 16-arc in PG(4,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(11,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(165, 16, F16, 5) (dual of [16, 11, 6]-code or 16-arc in PG(4,16)), using
- linear OOA(211, 5, F2, 3, 10) (dual of [(5, 3), 4, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,4P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- linear OA(165, 7, F16, 5) (dual of [7, 2, 6]-code or 7-arc in PG(4,16)), using
- concatenation of two NRT-codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.