Information on Result #1288770
Linear OA(939, 58, F9, 27) (dual of [58, 19, 28]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,25P) ⊂ AG(F,28P) based on
- linear OA(937, 53, F9, 27) (dual of [53, 16, 28]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,25P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 54, using
- linear OA(934, 53, F9, 24) (dual of [53, 19, 25]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,28P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 54 (see above)
- linear OA(92, 5, F9, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.