Information on Result #1288918
Linear OA(991, 116, F9, 62) (dual of [116, 25, 63]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,46P) ⊂ AG(F,50P) based on
- linear OA(988, 109, F9, 62) (dual of [109, 21, 63]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,46P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- linear OA(984, 109, F9, 58) (dual of [109, 25, 59]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,50P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110 (see above)
- linear OA(93, 7, F9, 3) (dual of [7, 4, 4]-code or 7-arc in PG(2,9) or 7-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.