Information on Result #1298241
Linear OA(396, 117, F3, 47) (dual of [117, 21, 48]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(392, 112, F3, 47) (dual of [112, 20, 48]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(918, 28, F9, 15) (dual of [28, 10, 16]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,12P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,12P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
- linear OA(918, 28, F9, 15) (dual of [28, 10, 16]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(392, 113, F3, 43) (dual of [113, 21, 44]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 392 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 72 813844 997265 169960 601325 843060 201267 770049 [i]
- linear OA(33, 4, F3, 3) (dual of [4, 1, 4]-code or 4-arc in PG(2,3) or 4-cap in PG(2,3)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 4 [i]
- oval in PG(2, 3) [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.