Information on Result #1306871
Linear OA(3169, 198, F3, 81) (dual of [198, 29, 82]-code), using 5 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 1, 1, 1, 1) based on linear OA(3163, 187, F3, 81) (dual of [187, 24, 82]-code), using
- 2 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3165, 189, F3, 83) (dual of [189, 24, 84]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2713, 21, F27, 13) (dual of [21, 8, 14]-code or 21-arc in PG(12,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2713, 27, F27, 13) (dual of [27, 14, 14]-code or 27-arc in PG(12,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(14,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2713, 27, F27, 13) (dual of [27, 14, 14]-code or 27-arc in PG(12,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2713, 21, F27, 13) (dual of [21, 8, 14]-code or 21-arc in PG(12,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.