Information on Result #1312382
Linear OA(852, 80, F8, 31) (dual of [80, 28, 32]-code), using 3 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 1, 0) based on linear OA(849, 74, F8, 31) (dual of [74, 25, 32]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(30) ⊂ Ce(26) [i] based on
- linear OA(846, 64, F8, 31) (dual of [64, 18, 32]-code), using an extension Ce(30) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 31 [i]
- linear OA(839, 64, F8, 27) (dual of [64, 25, 28]-code), using an extension Ce(26) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,26], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
- linear OA(83, 10, F8, 3) (dual of [10, 7, 4]-code or 10-arc in PG(2,8) or 10-cap in PG(2,8)), using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.