Information on Result #1317905
Linear OA(465, 88, F4, 34) (dual of [88, 23, 35]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(462, 84, F4, 34) (dual of [84, 22, 35]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(462, 88, F4, 34) (dual of [88, 26, 35]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(462, 88, F4, 35) (dual of [88, 26, 36]-code), using
- a “GraX†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(462, 88, F4, 35) (dual of [88, 26, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(462, 88, F4, 34) (dual of [88, 26, 35]-code), using
- linear OA(462, 85, F4, 31) (dual of [85, 23, 32]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 462 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 13 587685 730777 921068 160752 889826 233200 [i]
- linear OA(42, 3, F4, 2) (dual of [3, 1, 3]-code or 3-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 3 [i]
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.