Information on Result #1318021
Linear OA(571, 93, F5, 40) (dual of [93, 22, 41]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(570, 91, F5, 40) (dual of [91, 21, 41]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(570, 95, F5, 40) (dual of [95, 25, 41]-code), using
- 6 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(576, 101, F5, 46) (dual of [101, 25, 47]-code), using
- a “cyclic†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- 6 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(576, 101, F5, 46) (dual of [101, 25, 47]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(570, 95, F5, 40) (dual of [95, 25, 41]-code), using
- linear OA(570, 92, F5, 39) (dual of [92, 22, 40]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 570 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 5 533504 846912 922613 133333 571901 721594 291321 440925 [i]
- linear OA(50, 1, F5, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(50, s, F5, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.