Information on Result #2153026

There is no OA(2178, 297, S2, 76), because 2 times code embedding in larger space would yield OA(2180, 299, S2, 76), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OOA(2179, 297, S2, 2, 77) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
2No OOA(2178, 297, S2, 2, 76) [i]Depth Reduction
3No OOA(2178, 297, S2, 3, 76) [i]
4No OOA(2178, 297, S2, 4, 76) [i]
5No OOA(2178, 297, S2, 5, 76) [i]
6No OOA(2178, 297, S2, 6, 76) [i]
7No OOA(2178, 297, S2, 7, 76) [i]
8No OOA(2178, 297, S2, 8, 76) [i]
9No (102, 178, 297)-net in base 2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array