Information on Result #2153567

There is no OA(2201, 285, S2, 94), because 14 times code embedding in larger space would yield OA(2215, 299, S2, 94), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OOA(2202, 285, S2, 2, 95) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
2No OOA(2201, 285, S2, 2, 94) [i]Depth Reduction
3No OOA(2201, 285, S2, 3, 94) [i]
4No OOA(2201, 285, S2, 4, 94) [i]
5No OOA(2201, 285, S2, 5, 94) [i]
6No OOA(2201, 285, S2, 6, 94) [i]
7No OOA(2201, 285, S2, 7, 94) [i]
8No OOA(2201, 285, S2, 8, 94) [i]
9No (107, 201, 285)-net in base 2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array