Information on Result #2155692

There is no OA(5140, 291, S5, 108), because 9 times code embedding in larger space would yield OA(5149, 300, S5, 108), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OOA(5142, 291, S5, 2, 110) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
2No OOA(5143, 291, S5, 2, 111) [i]
3No OOA(5144, 291, S5, 2, 112) [i]
4No OOA(5145, 291, S5, 2, 113) [i]
5No OOA(5146, 291, S5, 2, 114) [i]
6No OOA(5147, 291, S5, 2, 115) [i]
7No OOA(5148, 291, S5, 2, 116) [i]
8No OOA(5149, 291, S5, 2, 117) [i]
9No OOA(5150, 291, S5, 2, 118) [i]
10No OOA(5140, 291, S5, 2, 108) [i]Depth Reduction
11No OOA(5140, 291, S5, 3, 108) [i]
12No (32, 140, 291)-net in base 5 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array