Information on Result #2156254

There is no linear OA(2104, 115, F2, 52) (dual of [115, 11, 53]-code), because adding a parity check bit would yield linear OA(2105, 116, F2, 53) (dual of [116, 11, 54]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(2105, 115, F2, 2, 53) (dual of [(115, 2), 125, 54]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
2No linear OOA(2107, 115, F2, 2, 55) (dual of [(115, 2), 123, 56]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(2104, 115, F2, 2, 52) (dual of [(115, 2), 126, 53]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2104, 115, F2, 3, 52) (dual of [(115, 3), 241, 53]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2104, 115, F2, 4, 52) (dual of [(115, 4), 356, 53]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2104, 115, F2, 5, 52) (dual of [(115, 5), 471, 53]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2104, 115, F2, 6, 52) (dual of [(115, 6), 586, 53]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2104, 115, F2, 7, 52) (dual of [(115, 7), 701, 53]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2104, 115, F2, 8, 52) (dual of [(115, 8), 816, 53]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (52, 104, 115)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array