Information on Result #2157632
There is no linear OA(2196, 222, F2, 94) (dual of [222, 26, 95]-code), because 2 times truncation would yield linear OA(2194, 220, F2, 92) (dual of [220, 26, 93]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2195, 221, F2, 93) (dual of [221, 26, 94]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OA(2196, 222, F2, 95) (dual of [222, 26, 96]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
| 2 | No linear OA(2193, 219, F2, 94) (dual of [219, 26, 95]-code) | [i] | Code Embedding in Larger Space | |
| 3 | No linear OA(2192, 218, F2, 94) (dual of [218, 26, 95]-code) | [i] | ||