Information on Result #2164074
There is no linear OA(4160, 165, F4, 122) (dual of [165, 5, 123]-code), because 2 times truncation would yield linear OA(4158, 163, F4, 120) (dual of [163, 5, 121]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(438, 42, F4, 30) (dual of [42, 4, 31]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(436, 40, F4, 28) (dual of [40, 4, 29]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(48, 11, F4, 7) (dual of [11, 3, 8]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(436, 40, F4, 28) (dual of [40, 4, 29]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.