Information on Result #2165096
There is no linear OA(4241, 248, F4, 182) (dual of [248, 7, 183]-code), because 2 times truncation would yield linear OA(4239, 246, F4, 180) (dual of [246, 7, 181]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(459, 65, F4, 45) (dual of [65, 6, 46]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(458, 64, F4, 44) (dual of [64, 6, 45]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(414, 19, F4, 11) (dual of [19, 5, 12]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- “Liz†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(414, 19, F4, 11) (dual of [19, 5, 12]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(458, 64, F4, 44) (dual of [64, 6, 45]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.