Information on Result #2174788
There is no linear OA(2171, 195, F2, 82) (dual of [195, 24, 83]-code), because 1 times code embedding in larger space would yield linear OA(2172, 196, F2, 82) (dual of [196, 24, 83]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2173, 197, F2, 83) (dual of [197, 24, 84]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OOA(2172, 195, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(195, 2), 218, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2173, 195, F2, 2, 84) (dual of [(195, 2), 217, 85]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(2174, 195, F2, 2, 85) (dual of [(195, 2), 216, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(2175, 195, F2, 2, 86) (dual of [(195, 2), 215, 87]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2176, 195, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(195, 2), 214, 88]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2171, 195, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(195, 2), 219, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 7 | No linear OOA(2171, 195, F2, 3, 82) (dual of [(195, 3), 414, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 8 | No linear OOA(2171, 195, F2, 4, 82) (dual of [(195, 4), 609, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 9 | No linear OOA(2171, 195, F2, 5, 82) (dual of [(195, 5), 804, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 10 | No linear OOA(2171, 195, F2, 6, 82) (dual of [(195, 6), 999, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 11 | No linear OOA(2171, 195, F2, 7, 82) (dual of [(195, 7), 1194, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 12 | No linear OOA(2171, 195, F2, 8, 82) (dual of [(195, 8), 1389, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 13 | No digital (89, 171, 195)-net over F2 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |