Information on Result #2190785
Linear OA(382, 98, F3, 44) (dual of [98, 16, 45]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(382, 98, F3, 46) (dual of [98, 16, 47]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C([1,99]) ⊂ C([1,81]) ⊂ C([1,79]) [i] based on
- linear OA(373, 80, F3, 49) (dual of [80, 7, 50]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3153, 160, F3, 99) (dual of [160, 7, 100]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,99], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 100 [i]
- linear OA(365, 80, F3, 40) (dual of [80, 15, 41]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3145, 160, F3, 81) (dual of [160, 15, 82]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,81], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 82 [i]
- linear OA(364, 80, F3, 39) (dual of [80, 16, 40]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3144, 160, F3, 79) (dual of [160, 16, 80]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,79], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 80 [i]
- linear OA(38, 17, F3, 5) (dual of [17, 9, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(38, 26, F3, 5) (dual of [26, 18, 6]-code), using
- dual code (with bound on d by construction Y1) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(38, 26, F3, 5) (dual of [26, 18, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(30, 1, F3, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- dual of repetition code with length 1 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.