Information on Result #2194503
Linear OA(3174, 194, F3, 94) (dual of [194, 20, 95]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3174, 194, F3, 95) (dual of [194, 20, 96]-code), using
- construction XX applied to Ce(97) ⊂ Ce(91) ⊂ Ce(90) [i] based on
- linear OA(3170, 183, F3, 98) (dual of [183, 13, 99]-code), using an extension Ce(97) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 182 | 36−1, defining interval I = [1,97], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 98 [i]
- linear OA(3164, 183, F3, 92) (dual of [183, 19, 93]-code), using an extension Ce(91) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 182 | 36−1, defining interval I = [1,91], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 92 [i]
- linear OA(3163, 183, F3, 91) (dual of [183, 20, 92]-code), using an extension Ce(90) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 182 | 36−1, defining interval I = [1,90], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 91 [i]
- linear OA(33, 10, F3, 2) (dual of [10, 7, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(33, 13, F3, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- Hamming code H(3,3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(33, 13, F3, 2) (dual of [13, 10, 3]-code), using
- linear OA(30, 1, F3, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- dual of repetition code with length 1 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.