MinT - Information on Result #2195078

Information on Result #2195078

Linear OA(3¹⁸⁴, 191, F₃, 117) (dual of [191, 7, 118]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3¹⁸⁴, 191, F₃, 118) (dual of [191, 7, 119]-code), using

juxtaposition [i] based on
1. linear OA(3¹⁶, 23, F₃, 10) (dual of [23, 7, 11]-code), using
  - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3¹⁶, 24, F₃, 10) (dual of [24, 8, 11]-code), using
    - 4 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(3²⁰, 28, F₃, 14) (dual of [28, 8, 15]-code), using
      - contraction [i] based on linear OA(3⁴⁸, 56, F₃, 29) (dual of [56, 8, 30]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 56Â | 3⁶âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â {0,1,…,28}, and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 30 [i]
2. linear OA(3¹⁶¹, 168, F₃, 107) (dual of [168, 7, 108]-code), using
  - (u,Â uâˆ’v,Â u+v+w)-construction [i] based on
    1. linear OA(3⁵⁰, 56, F₃, 35) (dual of [56, 6, 36]-code), using
      - dual code (with bound on d by constructionÂ Y1) [i] based on
        linear OA(3⁶, 56, F₃, 3) (dual of [56, 50, 4]-code or 56-cap in PG(5,3)), using
        the Hill cap [i]
        nonexistence of linear OA(3⁵, 21, F₃, 3) (dual of [21, 16, 4]-code or 21-cap in PG(4,3)), because
        20 is the largest size of a cap in PG(4,Â 3) [i]
    2. linear OA(3⁵⁵, 56, F₃, 53) (dual of [56, 1, 54]-code), using
      - strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(3⁵⁵, 56, F₃, 55) (dual of [56, 1, 56]-code or 56-arc in PG(54,3)), using
        dual of repetition code with length 56 [i]
    3. linear OA(3⁵⁶, 56, F₃, 56) (dual of [56, 0, 57]-code or 56-arc in PG(55,3)), using
      - complete OA / dual of code with only one code word [i]

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.