Information on Result #2200081
Linear OA(453, 80, F4, 25) (dual of [80, 27, 26]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(453, 80, F4, 26) (dual of [80, 27, 27]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C([1,80]) ⊂ C([1,65]) ⊂ C([1,62]) [i] based on
- linear OA(446, 63, F4, 26) (dual of [63, 17, 27]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4172, 189, F4, 80) (dual of [189, 17, 81]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [1,80], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 81 [i]
- linear OA(437, 63, F4, 21) (dual of [63, 26, 22]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4163, 189, F4, 65) (dual of [189, 26, 66]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [1,65], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 66 [i]
- linear OA(436, 63, F4, 20) (dual of [63, 27, 21]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4162, 189, F4, 62) (dual of [189, 27, 63]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [1,62], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 63 [i]
- linear OA(46, 16, F4, 4) (dual of [16, 10, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(46, 21, F4, 4) (dual of [21, 15, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(40, 1, F4, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- dual of repetition code with length 1 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.