Information on Result #2200684
Linear OA(487, 108, F4, 46) (dual of [108, 21, 47]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(487, 108, F4, 47) (dual of [108, 21, 48]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6411, 18, F64, 11) (dual of [18, 7, 12]-code or 18-arc in PG(10,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6411, 64, F64, 11) (dual of [64, 53, 12]-code or 64-arc in PG(10,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(53,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6411, 64, F64, 11) (dual of [64, 53, 12]-code or 64-arc in PG(10,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6411, 18, F64, 11) (dual of [18, 7, 12]-code or 18-arc in PG(10,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(487, 54, F4, 2, 46) (dual of [(54, 2), 21, 47]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
2 | Linear OOA(487, 36, F4, 3, 46) (dual of [(36, 3), 21, 47]-NRT-code) | [i] |