Information on Result #2202635
Linear OA(4149, 215, F4, 64) (dual of [215, 66, 65]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(4149, 215, F4, 65) (dual of [215, 66, 66]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6421, 43, F64, 21) (dual of [43, 22, 22]-code or 43-arc in PG(20,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6421, 64, F64, 21) (dual of [64, 43, 22]-code or 64-arc in PG(20,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(43,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6421, 64, F64, 21) (dual of [64, 43, 22]-code or 64-arc in PG(20,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6421, 43, F64, 21) (dual of [43, 22, 22]-code or 43-arc in PG(20,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.