Information on Result #2206516
Linear OA(4225, 252, F4, 134) (dual of [252, 27, 135]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(4225, 252, F4, 135) (dual of [252, 27, 136]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6433, 42, F64, 33) (dual of [42, 9, 34]-code or 42-arc in PG(32,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6433, 64, F64, 33) (dual of [64, 31, 34]-code or 64-arc in PG(32,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(31,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6433, 64, F64, 33) (dual of [64, 31, 34]-code or 64-arc in PG(32,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6433, 42, F64, 33) (dual of [42, 9, 34]-code or 42-arc in PG(32,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(4224, 251, F4, 133) (dual of [251, 27, 134]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | Linear OA(4223, 250, F4, 132) (dual of [250, 27, 133]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(4225, 126, F4, 2, 134) (dual of [(126, 2), 27, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 4 | Linear OOA(4225, 84, F4, 3, 134) (dual of [(84, 3), 27, 135]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||