Information on Result #2211819
Linear OA(778, 88, F7, 52) (dual of [88, 10, 53]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(778, 88, F7, 53) (dual of [88, 10, 54]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(4917, 22, F49, 17) (dual of [22, 5, 18]-code or 22-arc in PG(16,49)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4917, 49, F49, 17) (dual of [49, 32, 18]-code or 49-arc in PG(16,49)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(32,49) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4917, 49, F49, 17) (dual of [49, 32, 18]-code or 49-arc in PG(16,49)), using
- linear OA(72, 4, F7, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(72, 7, F7, 2) (dual of [7, 5, 3]-code or 7-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,7) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(72, 7, F7, 2) (dual of [7, 5, 3]-code or 7-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- linear OA(4917, 22, F49, 17) (dual of [22, 5, 18]-code or 22-arc in PG(16,49)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(778, 44, F7, 2, 52) (dual of [(44, 2), 10, 53]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |