Information on Result #2213471
Linear OA(8122, 132, F8, 87) (dual of [132, 10, 88]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(8122, 132, F8, 89) (dual of [132, 10, 90]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6417, 22, F64, 17) (dual of [22, 5, 18]-code or 22-arc in PG(16,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6417, 64, F64, 17) (dual of [64, 47, 18]-code or 64-arc in PG(16,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(47,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6417, 64, F64, 17) (dual of [64, 47, 18]-code or 64-arc in PG(16,64)), using
- linear OA(84, 6, F8, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(84, 8, F8, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(4,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(84, 8, F8, 4) (dual of [8, 4, 5]-code or 8-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- linear OA(6417, 22, F64, 17) (dual of [22, 5, 18]-code or 22-arc in PG(16,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.