Information on Result #2214966
Linear OA(8172, 200, F8, 108) (dual of [200, 28, 109]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(8172, 200, F8, 110) (dual of [200, 28, 111]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6436, 50, F64, 36) (dual of [50, 14, 37]-code or 50-arc in PG(35,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6436, 64, F64, 36) (dual of [64, 28, 37]-code or 64-arc in PG(35,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(28,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6436, 64, F64, 36) (dual of [64, 28, 37]-code or 64-arc in PG(35,64)), using
- linear OA(82, 4, F8, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- linear OA(6436, 50, F64, 36) (dual of [50, 14, 37]-code or 50-arc in PG(35,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.