Information on Result #2215428
Linear OA(983, 92, F9, 66) (dual of [92, 9, 67]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(983, 92, F9, 67) (dual of [92, 9, 68]-code), using
- construction XX applied to Ce(69) ⊂ Ce(60) ⊂ Ce(59) [i] based on
- linear OA(977, 81, F9, 70) (dual of [81, 4, 71]-code), using an extension Ce(69) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,69], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 70 [i]
- linear OA(973, 81, F9, 61) (dual of [81, 8, 62]-code), using an extension Ce(60) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,60], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 61 [i]
- linear OA(972, 81, F9, 60) (dual of [81, 9, 61]-code), using an extension Ce(59) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,59], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 60 [i]
- linear OA(95, 10, F9, 5) (dual of [10, 5, 6]-code or 10-arc in PG(4,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(5,9) [i]
- linear OA(90, 1, F9, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- dual of repetition code with length 1 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(983, 46, F9, 2, 66) (dual of [(46, 2), 9, 67]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |