Information on Result #2215452
Linear OA(985, 101, F9, 60) (dual of [101, 16, 61]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(985, 101, F9, 61) (dual of [101, 16, 62]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(60) ⊂ Ce(49) [i] based on
- linear OA(973, 81, F9, 61) (dual of [81, 8, 62]-code), using an extension Ce(60) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,60], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 61 [i]
- linear OA(965, 81, F9, 50) (dual of [81, 16, 51]-code), using an extension Ce(49) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [1,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 50 [i]
- linear OA(912, 20, F9, 10) (dual of [20, 8, 11]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,9P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(983, 99, F9, 58) (dual of [99, 16, 59]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | Linear OA(981, 97, F9, 56) (dual of [97, 16, 57]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OA(980, 96, F9, 55) (dual of [96, 16, 56]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OA(979, 95, F9, 54) (dual of [95, 16, 55]-code) | [i] | ||