Information on Result #2216837
Linear OA(1670, 73, F16, 64) (dual of [73, 3, 65]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(1670, 73, F16, 65) (dual of [73, 3, 66]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(165, 8, F16, 5) (dual of [8, 3, 6]-code or 8-arc in PG(4,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(165, 16, F16, 5) (dual of [16, 11, 6]-code or 16-arc in PG(4,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(11,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(165, 16, F16, 5) (dual of [16, 11, 6]-code or 16-arc in PG(4,16)), using
- linear OA(1662, 65, F16, 59) (dual of [65, 3, 60]-code), using
- linear OA(165, 8, F16, 5) (dual of [8, 3, 6]-code or 8-arc in PG(4,16)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.