Information on Result #2219956
Linear OA(267, 79, F2, 30) (dual of [79, 12, 31]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(268, 80, F2, 31) (dual of [80, 12, 32]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(167, 10, F16, 7) (dual of [10, 3, 8]-code or 10-arc in PG(6,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(167, 16, F16, 7) (dual of [16, 9, 8]-code or 16-arc in PG(6,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(9,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(167, 16, F16, 7) (dual of [16, 9, 8]-code or 16-arc in PG(6,16)), using
- linear OA(24, 8, F2, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- linear OA(167, 10, F16, 7) (dual of [10, 3, 8]-code or 10-arc in PG(6,16)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.