Information on Result #2220274
Linear OA(277, 93, F2, 32) (dual of [93, 16, 33]-code), using 3 times truncation based on linear OA(280, 96, F2, 35) (dual of [96, 16, 36]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(168, 12, F16, 8) (dual of [12, 4, 9]-code or 12-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(168, 16, F16, 8) (dual of [16, 8, 9]-code or 16-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(168, 16, F16, 8) (dual of [16, 8, 9]-code or 16-arc in PG(7,16)), using
- linear OA(24, 8, F2, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- linear OA(168, 12, F16, 8) (dual of [12, 4, 9]-code or 12-arc in PG(7,16)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(277, 31, F2, 3, 32) (dual of [(31, 3), 16, 33]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |