Information on Result #2224703
Linear OA(2194, 214, F2, 80) (dual of [214, 20, 81]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(2196, 216, F2, 82) (dual of [216, 20, 83]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2196, 216, F2, 83) (dual of [216, 20, 84]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1622, 27, F16, 20) (dual of [27, 5, 21]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1622, 33, F16, 20) (dual of [33, 11, 21]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,12P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1622, 33, F16, 20) (dual of [33, 11, 21]-code), using
- linear OA(24, 8, F2, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- linear OA(1622, 27, F16, 20) (dual of [27, 5, 21]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.