Information on Result #2225574
Linear OA(2259, 268, F2, 128) (dual of [268, 9, 129]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(2260, 269, F2, 129) (dual of [269, 9, 130]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2260, 269, F2, 130) (dual of [269, 9, 131]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(24, 13, F2, 2) (dual of [13, 9, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(24, 15, F2, 2) (dual of [15, 11, 3]-code), using
- Hamming code H(4,2) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(24, 15, F2, 2) (dual of [15, 11, 3]-code), using
- linear OA(2247, 256, F2, 127) (dual of [256, 9, 128]-code), using
- Reed–Muller code RM(6,8) [i]
- linear OA(24, 13, F2, 2) (dual of [13, 9, 3]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.