Information on Result #2230726
Linear OA(3131, 155, F3, 59) (dual of [155, 24, 60]-code), using 5 times truncation based on linear OA(3136, 160, F3, 64) (dual of [160, 24, 65]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2712, 20, F27, 12) (dual of [20, 8, 13]-code or 20-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2712, 27, F27, 12) (dual of [27, 15, 13]-code or 27-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(15,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2712, 27, F27, 12) (dual of [27, 15, 13]-code or 27-arc in PG(11,27)), using
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(2712, 20, F27, 12) (dual of [20, 8, 13]-code or 20-arc in PG(11,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.