Information on Result #2231378
Linear OA(3166, 187, F3, 86) (dual of [187, 21, 87]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(3168, 189, F3, 88) (dual of [189, 21, 89]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(3168, 189, F3, 89) (dual of [189, 21, 90]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2714, 21, F27, 14) (dual of [21, 7, 15]-code or 21-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2714, 27, F27, 14) (dual of [27, 13, 15]-code or 27-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(13,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2714, 27, F27, 14) (dual of [27, 13, 15]-code or 27-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2714, 21, F27, 14) (dual of [21, 7, 15]-code or 21-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.