Information on Result #2231605
Linear OA(3191, 206, F3, 108) (dual of [206, 15, 109]-code), using 10 times truncation based on linear OA(3201, 216, F3, 118) (dual of [216, 15, 119]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(3201, 216, F3, 119) (dual of [216, 15, 120]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2719, 24, F27, 19) (dual of [24, 5, 20]-code or 24-arc in PG(18,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2719, 27, F27, 19) (dual of [27, 8, 20]-code or 27-arc in PG(18,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(8,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2719, 27, F27, 19) (dual of [27, 8, 20]-code or 27-arc in PG(18,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2719, 24, F27, 19) (dual of [24, 5, 20]-code or 24-arc in PG(18,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.