Information on Result #2232037
Linear OA(3209, 224, F3, 120) (dual of [224, 15, 121]-code), using 10 times truncation based on linear OA(3219, 234, F3, 130) (dual of [234, 15, 131]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(3219, 234, F3, 131) (dual of [234, 15, 132]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2721, 26, F27, 21) (dual of [26, 5, 22]-code or 26-arc in PG(20,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2721, 27, F27, 21) (dual of [27, 6, 22]-code or 27-arc in PG(20,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2721, 27, F27, 21) (dual of [27, 6, 22]-code or 27-arc in PG(20,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2721, 26, F27, 21) (dual of [26, 5, 22]-code or 26-arc in PG(20,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.