Information on Result #2232131
Linear OA(3180, 212, F3, 90) (dual of [212, 32, 91]-code), using 32 times truncation based on linear OA(3212, 244, F3, 122) (dual of [244, 32, 123]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(121) ⊂ Ce(120) [i] based on
- linear OA(3212, 243, F3, 122) (dual of [243, 31, 123]-code), using an extension Ce(121) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [1,121], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 122 [i]
- linear OA(3211, 243, F3, 121) (dual of [243, 32, 122]-code), using an extension Ce(120) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 242 = 35−1, defining interval I = [1,120], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 121 [i]
- linear OA(30, 1, F3, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(30, s, F3, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(3186, 219, F3, 90) (dual of [219, 33, 91]-code) | [i] | Construction X with Varšamov Bound | |
| 2 | Linear OA(3188, 222, F3, 90) (dual of [222, 34, 91]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OA(3191, 226, F3, 90) (dual of [226, 35, 91]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OA(3190, 226, F3, 89) (dual of [226, 36, 90]-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OA(3191, 228, F3, 89) (dual of [228, 37, 90]-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OOA(3180, 106, F3, 2, 90) (dual of [(106, 2), 32, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 7 | Linear OOA(3180, 70, F3, 3, 90) (dual of [(70, 3), 30, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 8 | Linear OOA(3180, 42, F3, 5, 90) (dual of [(42, 5), 30, 91]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||