Information on Result #2232966
Linear OA(3178, 214, F3, 76) (dual of [214, 36, 77]-code), using 6 times truncation based on linear OA(3184, 220, F3, 82) (dual of [220, 36, 83]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(3184, 220, F3, 83) (dual of [220, 36, 84]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8113, 22, F81, 13) (dual of [22, 9, 14]-code or 22-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8113, 81, F81, 13) (dual of [81, 68, 14]-code or 81-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(68,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8113, 81, F81, 13) (dual of [81, 68, 14]-code or 81-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- linear OA(36, 10, F3, 5) (dual of [10, 4, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(8113, 22, F81, 13) (dual of [22, 9, 14]-code or 22-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.