Information on Result #2236280
Linear OA(491, 101, F4, 59) (dual of [101, 10, 60]-code), using 4 times truncation based on linear OA(495, 105, F4, 63) (dual of [105, 10, 64]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1616, 21, F16, 15) (dual of [21, 5, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1616, 24, F16, 15) (dual of [24, 8, 16]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,8P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1616, 24, F16, 15) (dual of [24, 8, 16]-code), using
- linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1616, 21, F16, 15) (dual of [21, 5, 16]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.