Information on Result #2237234
Linear OA(495, 116, F4, 51) (dual of [116, 21, 52]-code), using 4 times truncation based on linear OA(499, 120, F4, 55) (dual of [120, 21, 56]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6413, 20, F64, 13) (dual of [20, 7, 14]-code or 20-arc in PG(12,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6413, 64, F64, 13) (dual of [64, 51, 14]-code or 64-arc in PG(12,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(51,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6413, 64, F64, 13) (dual of [64, 51, 14]-code or 64-arc in PG(12,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6413, 20, F64, 13) (dual of [20, 7, 14]-code or 20-arc in PG(12,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.