Information on Result #2237965
Linear OA(487, 135, F4, 36) (dual of [135, 48, 37]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(488, 136, F4, 37) (dual of [136, 48, 38]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6418, 34, F64, 18) (dual of [34, 16, 19]-code or 34-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6418, 64, F64, 18) (dual of [64, 46, 19]-code or 64-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(46,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6418, 64, F64, 18) (dual of [64, 46, 19]-code or 64-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- linear OA(41, 4, F4, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(6418, 34, F64, 18) (dual of [34, 16, 19]-code or 34-arc in PG(17,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.