Information on Result #2239287
Linear OA(4152, 173, F4, 89) (dual of [173, 21, 90]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4153, 174, F4, 90) (dual of [174, 21, 91]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4153, 174, F4, 91) (dual of [174, 21, 92]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6422, 29, F64, 22) (dual of [29, 7, 23]-code or 29-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6422, 64, F64, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(42,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6422, 64, F64, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6422, 29, F64, 22) (dual of [29, 7, 23]-code or 29-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.