Information on Result #2239302
Linear OA(4131, 161, F4, 68) (dual of [161, 30, 69]-code), using 7 times truncation based on linear OA(4138, 168, F4, 75) (dual of [168, 30, 76]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6418, 28, F64, 18) (dual of [28, 10, 19]-code or 28-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6418, 64, F64, 18) (dual of [64, 46, 19]-code or 64-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(46,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6418, 64, F64, 18) (dual of [64, 46, 19]-code or 64-arc in PG(17,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6418, 28, F64, 18) (dual of [28, 10, 19]-code or 28-arc in PG(17,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.