Information on Result #2239608
Linear OA(4133, 169, F4, 67) (dual of [169, 36, 68]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4134, 170, F4, 68) (dual of [170, 36, 69]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6422, 34, F64, 22) (dual of [34, 12, 23]-code or 34-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6422, 64, F64, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(42,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6422, 64, F64, 22) (dual of [64, 42, 23]-code or 64-arc in PG(21,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6422, 34, F64, 22) (dual of [34, 12, 23]-code or 34-arc in PG(21,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.