Information on Result #2239989
Linear OA(4172, 193, F4, 102) (dual of [193, 21, 103]-code), using 5 times truncation based on linear OA(4177, 198, F4, 107) (dual of [198, 21, 108]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6426, 33, F64, 26) (dual of [33, 7, 27]-code or 33-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6426, 64, F64, 26) (dual of [64, 38, 27]-code or 64-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(38,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6426, 64, F64, 26) (dual of [64, 38, 27]-code or 64-arc in PG(25,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6426, 33, F64, 26) (dual of [33, 7, 27]-code or 33-arc in PG(25,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.