Information on Result #2240118
Linear OA(4146, 182, F4, 75) (dual of [182, 36, 76]-code), using 4 times truncation based on linear OA(4150, 186, F4, 79) (dual of [186, 36, 80]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6419, 31, F64, 19) (dual of [31, 12, 20]-code or 31-arc in PG(18,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6419, 64, F64, 19) (dual of [64, 45, 20]-code or 64-arc in PG(18,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(45,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6419, 64, F64, 19) (dual of [64, 45, 20]-code or 64-arc in PG(18,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6419, 31, F64, 19) (dual of [31, 12, 20]-code or 31-arc in PG(18,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.