Information on Result #2240952
Linear OA(4190, 217, F4, 110) (dual of [217, 27, 111]-code), using 5 times truncation based on linear OA(4195, 222, F4, 115) (dual of [222, 27, 116]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6428, 37, F64, 28) (dual of [37, 9, 29]-code or 37-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6428, 64, F64, 28) (dual of [64, 36, 29]-code or 64-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(36,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6428, 64, F64, 28) (dual of [64, 36, 29]-code or 64-arc in PG(27,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6428, 37, F64, 28) (dual of [37, 9, 29]-code or 37-arc in PG(27,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.