Information on Result #2241662
Linear OA(4233, 251, F4, 144) (dual of [251, 18, 145]-code), using 7 times truncation based on linear OA(4240, 258, F4, 151) (dual of [258, 18, 152]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6437, 43, F64, 37) (dual of [43, 6, 38]-code or 43-arc in PG(36,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6437, 64, F64, 37) (dual of [64, 27, 38]-code or 64-arc in PG(36,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(27,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6437, 64, F64, 37) (dual of [64, 27, 38]-code or 64-arc in PG(36,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6437, 43, F64, 37) (dual of [43, 6, 38]-code or 43-arc in PG(36,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.